In the 1980s a major switch happened in the culture and population of colleges and universities. Instead of the stereotypical 18-year-old recent high school graduate, the non-traditional student became the norm on campus. Most authorities define a non-traditional student as someone who is over 25 years of age, attends college or university on a part-time basis, commute to school, or any combination of these characteristics. From 1970 to 1985, the growth rate for non-traditional students was 114%, compared to a much smaller increase of 15% in the number of younger, traditional students. Nontraditional students increased over time from one in four undergraduates in 1986 to nearly one in three (31%) in 1992 (Horn and Carroll, 1996). Part-time students have also increased 87%. Full-time students only increased 22% over the same time period. According to a 1991 report, 80% of all students in higher education are commuters and do not live on campus or in campus housing. (Villela & Hu, 1991)
The increase in non-traditional enrollment in higher education over the past two decades is the result of many different cultural shifts, including an aging population, equal opportunity and access to education, and the increasing existence of educational experiences tailored for the non-traditional student. Women form a large portion of non-traditional students; many of them are taking advantage of the first access to higher education in their lifetime. Older learners are taking advantage of longer life spans and are either going back to school for job fulfillment or learning for the sake of learning and self-actualization. Non-traditional students are either degree seekers, problem solvers, or cultural environment seekers (Noel, 1985). Opportunities for minorities have also increased the enrollment of non-traditional students in colleges and universities. The working world has also experienced a major cultural shift and many occupations, vocations and professions require higher educational achievement than in the past, even for entry level jobs. Higher education has changed many of its models to accommodate this kind of learning.
Approximately 68% of non-traditional students matriculate (Villella & Hu, 1991). The difficulties in quantifying this number exactly are in part due to the difficulty of precisely defining who is and who is not a non-traditional student. Is there a typical non-traditional student, and, if so, what does he or she look like? Therefore, the factors that affect whether or not a non-traditional student stays in school vary widely throughout the population. This is a population whose defining characteristics (age, marital and parental status, age, ethnicity) are constantly in flux (Marlow, 1989). Men and women have different experiences and needs; students with children have widely different issues from those without children; single parents have different experiences and needs than married couples or partners with children. Women and men experience different needs. Students with children have very different problems from students without children. Different ethnic groups, while they are often gathered together under the larger tag of “minority” despite the fact that their experiences and educational needs vary widely.
Since the majority of students at colleges and universities now fit into the non-traditional demographic, higher education faculty and administrators need to understand the needs of this community and know why they drop out of school and why they finish their education. This paper will discuss the many different factors that non-traditional students take into account when they make their decisions and how these relate to attrition and retention, and (b) the role that faculty and administrators must play in providing the necessary services for nontraditional students.
Review of Literature
Over the past few decades, college and university enrollment of the non-traditional student has increased markedly, and this trend has been projected to continue (Aslanian & Brickell, 1980; Padula, 1994; Thomas, 2001). While many non-traditional students have found great success, some non-traditional students have reported being less satisfied than their traditional counterparts with some parts of the university experience, specifically counseling and advising services (e.g., Badenhoop & Johansen, 1980; Kirk & Dorfman, 1983; Malin, Bray, Dougherty, & Skinner, 1980; Sands & Richardson, 1984).
In order to explore the experience of the non-traditional student at the university level, it is important to address the kinds of support they receive on campus. Much of the literature relevant to non-traditional students has failed to focus on these components of university life. Rather, the literature has focused on another component of the non-traditional student’s life — the benefits of external family and social supports that nontraditional students receive. This kind of support has been underscored in several research studies (e.g., Bauer & Mott, 1990), and at least three unique aspects of this important social support have been identified and explored (House, 1981):
(a) Practical kinds of tangible aid and help, including loans from family members and friends to help defray educational costs; (b) information and advice that helps an individual cope with the stresses raised by going to school; and (c) support that includes praise and validation that improved the non-traditional student’s self-esteem and validates his or her choice to go back to school.
Padula (1994) suggested that several areas need to be explored in creating the best possible experience for non-traditional students: (a) services non-traditional students want and need from advisement and counseling services and (b) how integration of these services should be designed, keeping the student, his or her family, and the university community in mind. These kinds of supports have been show to be valuable to non-traditional students, and studies need to be conducted to further refine their experiences and needs.
According to a 2005 study, a traditional student is one who “entered higher education at the age of 18 straight from school or further education, [and] studied continuously and full time for either three or four years” (Laing, Kuo-Ming, and Robinson). One of the reasons these student see a high success rate is that they usually come from families who have also had experiences with higher education. As children in the families, the traditional student is influenced to pursue a college degree and more prepared to enter the college environment. Both traditional and non-traditional students are influenced by their families’ experiences with higher education, and the effect varies based on the family’s history (Laing et al. 2005).
One of the difficult challenges for non-tradition students is the transition from their regular life out in the world back into a school setting. Going straight from high school to a higher education setting, is an equivalent institution, eases the transition for traditional students. Traditional students have been attending school and living on the school calendar for most of their lives, continuously and intensively, whereas the non-traditional student may have left that environment 10, 20 or more years ago. For the non-traditional student, colleges and universities can be “isolating and” in ways that just aren’t experienced by students going straight from, essentially, one school to another. (Bowl 2001). This does not mean that the challenge of transition cannot be overcome, or that non-traditional students cannot succeed. In fact, in some ways they are more prepared than their traditional counterparts because they have developed the life skills gained from holding jobs and raising families. In this way, traditional students are often the ones unprepared for college life. Many students’ perceptions of higher education are skewed and based on stereotypical assumptions. These perceptions are typically based on their experiences in secondary education. Many believe that college will be moderately difficult academically, and extremely exciting socially (Laing 2005). Baker, McNeil, and Siryk (1985) address a concept called the “matriculant myth,” which is that first year students’ expectation of the university experience is much better than the actual experience they find when they arrive and jump into college life. When a student has a less pronounced version of the myth in his or her head, the adjustment to the college experience is easier. The myth has also been found to persist in transfer students as well as first year students (Buckley, 1971; Donato, 1973). As with any personal believe, there are variations in the intensity of the myth between individual students, but the variance does not appear to fall along gender lines. Men and women hold the myth equally (Baker, McNeil, and Siryk, 1985). Younger students also tend to assume that their teachers in college and the learning environment and expectations are similar to those they just left behind in high school. Too often this results in “many students (due in part to their previous educational experiences) will have entered higher education without having taken responsibility for their own learning” (Laing 2005:170).
Attrition is a complicated issue for any student, but for a non-traditional student, the issues are even more complex, especially for those who may be giving higher education a second chance after dropping out earlier in their lives. According to Noel (1985) there are several major themes that influence a non-traditional student’s decision to drop out of school. They include academic boredom and uncertainty about what to study, limited and/or unrealistic expectations of the university experiences, transition/adjustment problems, being academically unprepared or under-prepared, and irrelevancy. Pantages and Creedon (1978) have reported that the greatest attrition rate occurs among first-year students, and this group is not very likely to return to college at a later date. Even if they do drop out, the longer a student persists in a university or college setting the more likely it is that they will perceive attaining a degree as beneficial (Tinto, 1975). Additionally, retention studies have emphasized that social and academic integration at the school is a major factor in retention (Pascarella and Chapman, 1983). Attaining this integration is over a challenge for the non-traditional student, as they often commute to campus and are not around the college setting during the off hours when many social activities take place. Murguia, Padilla, and Pavel (1991) discovered that students in minority ethnic groups often had access to this social integration through groups, clubs and enclaves on campus aimed at their specific group. Bean (1980) found differences between the genders in the reasons for leaving school. Men need satisfaction in the role of a student, institutional commitment, being valued by the institution, a predictable and a stable routine. Women need to have a sense that the role of a student is routine, institutional commitment and quality programs. Institutional commitment — the sense that the college or university understands their needs as non-traditional students and makes accommodations for such needs — ranked as the most significant indicator of satisfaction for both groups. Another strong factor in student retention is the quality of the relationship between the student and faculty. (Pascarella & Tetrazini, 1980). Also relevant was how the student adjusted to college; a well-adjusted student is more likely to be persistent in finishing his or her degree. A 1991 study by Mooney, Sherman, and LoPresto found that this adjustment to college is affected by the student’s level of self-esteem, a perception that the distance from home is “just right,” and an internal “academic locus of control. A higher level of self-esteem and confidence contributed greatly to whether a student would make it through the chosen academic discipline.
There are numerous and varied factors that affect a non-traditional student’s participation in and persistence at finishing college, and these often differ from factors that affect traditional students’ attrition rates. Some factors are previous educational success, the availability of non-credit courses for people who lack in academic preparedness, and good communication from the school about educational programs. In their study, Villella and Hu (1991) discovered that the reality of time constraints of college terms (quarters, trimesters, etc.) and the amount of academic rigor required by university-level courses often led to student stress and dissatisfaction, especially among non-traditional students, who very often have other responsibilities to fit around their academic career, including working full- or part-time, caring for children, etc. Any of these factors, separately or combined, can result in non-traditional students leaving school when traditional students may have persevered.
A 2001 study performed by Bowl “points to the need for institutional change if non-traditional students are to thrive within a system that purports to be directed toward widening participation.” The study found that non-traditional students are often frustrated with the lacking accommodation that has been made for their needs on college and university campuses (Bowl, 2001) Non-traditional students are already more likely to enter the school feeling lost and powerless, and entering into higher education can be a “struggle for personal, academic, financial and emotional survival” (Bowl, 2001). Non-traditional students who took part in the study often described their school days as being too much for them to fit into their already busy lives, and many felt they may have been better off in a vocational school setting. They also felt that by entering college at on older age they would be forced into the job market immediately upon graduation (Bowl, 2001). Non-traditional students are often juggling more than the traditional student simply because they are at different stages of their lives. Traditional students, who are usually 21 or 22 when they graduate college, will usually graduate and then start worrying about starting a family, buying a house, paying bills, etc. Non-traditional students already have these added stressors
In the area of non-traditional students, some researchers have turned their attention to examining the relationship of success in college and adult developmental stages. Gleazer (1980). uses Vivian R. McCoy’s seven developmental stages as a way to look at non-traditional students and their possible paths to success. Each of the seven stages requires learning skills to handle life’s basic tasks, and these tasks offer “teachable moments, because the motivation to learn the new skills and complete the tasks also contributes to the motivation to learn. Champagne and Petitpas (1989) argue that both traditional and non-traditional students are at a transition point, a teachable moment, in their lives that has led them to seek formal education. The specific tasks to learn may differ from group to group, but the transition process is very similar.
The profile of the college student has evolved over the past few decades, but so have the learning environments that the can access. Universities have recognized that people’s lives are perpetually busy, especially the lives of non-traditional students who are not always able to take advantage of school breaks and vacations because they have families and work full-time (Buerck, Malmstrom and Peppers, 2002). To accommodate the ever-increasing time crunch of their students, schools have started offering courses online as well as in person. Non-traditional students can often return to school online when it would be impossible for them to return to an on-campus, classroom setting. It is also more difficult for the non-traditional student to move themselves and their families to attend school locally. Online courses enable these students to participate in higher education, regardless of where they live.
Interestingly, there has been little research into the actual experience of online learning (Vallee, 2007), particularly regarding the nontraditional, adult student. This gap is currently being filled, as many of the research studies on the efficacy of online learning is still ongoing. Most of the studies reviewed for this paper also bemoaned the lack of qualitative data with respect to the experiences and perceptions of online students, especially the non-traditional adult learner (Maxfield, 2008). This data is especially relevant, however, because the presence of an online learning environment could be a “major factor” in a non-traditional student returning to school (Tsai & Chuang, 2005).
Another issue for non-traditional students is whether they find the teaching they receive at a university to be effective. Traditional pedagogies simply aren’t designed for the adult learner. Andragogy, or “adult learning” may be a necessity in the new college environment, instead of the option is now. As recently as 2001, current learning theories and models had failed to inform or influence instructional practices, especially in two of the places adult learners have the most access, distance and online learning (Barclay, 2001). Designing a workable method that enables non-traditional students to apply their knowledge immediately, while still being self-directed in their learning, could help create an effective delivery model. Non-traditional students need to move “away from their old habits and into new patterns of learning where they become self-directed, take responsibility for their own learning, and the direction it takes” (Fidishun, n.d., p. 3). Most non-traditional students are accustomed to being self-directed (Gibbons & Wentworth, 2001). If the professors allow them the freedom to learn and explore, there can be success and retention. Non-traditional students do not want to be made to feel like they are back in elementary school when they return to a university. With the help of technology, online learning has been able to balance the need for both self-directed learning and traditional classroom learning, which non-traditional students often still feel attached to.
Higher education is now, more than ever, an option for the non-traditional student. As Buerck, et al. pointed out, “Research has demonstrated that key components within the learning environment, such as openness, community, interpersonal interaction, and accessibility, can be enhanced through the use of advanced technologies in the classroomâ€¦and offers potential benefits (e.g. increased retention and convenience, lower cost, the ability to transcend geographical barriers) compared to traditional environments” (2002).
A study done by Buerck et al. (2002) examines the retention of non-traditional students in an online vs. lecture-based computer science course. The participants in the study were all non-traditional students in computer science who were given the option of taking this particular course online or in person. The researchers designed the study with the independent variable as learning environment and the dependent variable was the student’s final grade in the class. The findings were that there was no significant difference in final grades (Buerck et al. 2002). There is one caveat to the study, in that the researchers felt that the students who took the course online probably did better in it because they decided on that learning environment voluntarily. This study is also nine years old, and online learning technologies have improved vastly in that time, to include teleconferencing as well as integrated online classroom software. It does point us in the direction however, of seeing the online learning environment as one where non-traditional students could thrive. Computer science students partaking in online courses performed almost equally to those in the classroom setting. The research did conclude, however, that students who took the course online probably did as well as their counterparts because they voluntarily enrolled in it.
A study by Maxfield (2008) proved useful in figuring out the kinds of lifestyle challenges non-traditional students may face in their quest for higher education. Maxfield was specifically studying emergency service workers who were going back to school for advanced degrees, but his findings do not seem inherently limited to this particular profession among non-traditional students. There were two specific phenomena that arose in Maxfield’s study: the value of education, and life’s interruptions. (2008). Each one of the students who took part in the study, all non-traditional students, expressed a belief in the value of education. This belief may have arisen from the fact that the students had been away from education long enough to be able to asses it’s real value. They also realized that education was “important to their careers and to the welfare of their families” (Maxfield, 2008). The students all demonstrated that their attitudes toward learning had changed with experience and maturity; they were driven to succeed and much more focused about achieving their goals.
As a result of the life experience of these nontraditional adult students, education seemed to take on a definite importance and provided a new schema and tool for self-motivation along with the benefit of setting an example to other family members. This motivation appears consistent with the literature and true of most nontraditional adult students returning to school after extended periods of living in the world and working in the competitive career environment. The students in this study were also likely to report that their responsibilities to career and families took a toll on their academic progress. According to Maxfield, “These issues appear to hold true for older students attending traditional face-to-face course deliveries as well as those who enroll in the asynchronous online classes; the extant literature on adult learning has made this case. (2008).
The down-side of online schooling — students’ lives are already busy, so when other areas get busy (like family time, civic, religious activities, etc.), time for doing class work is crunched. it’s easy to procrastinate doing assignments and get behind. it’s hard to stay involved with the discussion postings if you’re a week or two behind the current discussion topic. With the difficulty of adding the load of school to an already busy life, the students have to juggle study time with other responsibilities.
These experiences and perceptions, the value of education and life’s interruptions, appear common to all adult students. Although they are not specific to the nontraditional adult student taking asynchronous, online classes, they are an important part of the experience of these
There are many different kinds of support services that the non-traditional student needs, and these do not always overlap with services for traditional students. Universities and colleges, in order to help non-traditional students succeed, need to tailor their services for this group’s specific needs. As a first step, University administrations and faculty need to avail themselves of the current research describing the particular issues that non-traditional students face. Services in the areas of student activities, counseling, career planning, teaching and learning processes, learning assistance programs, advising, admissions, financial aid, and orientation programs all need to be addressed. Those in charge of planning these programs also need to be aware of the diversity of the non-traditional student population. Each has different needs and, therefore, needs to be served by different programs. The following section of the literature review discusses the research in this specific area, and how each of the various systems contributes to student success in its own way. In evaluating whether or not their schooling was a success, students are likely to refer to these support systems as reasons why they stayed in school.
Non-traditional students are most often motivated to pursue a degree because of career advancement desires and self-improvement. (e.g., Aslanian & Brickell, 1980; Padula, 1994). Because career concerns are often the most critical, non-traditional students are most likely to avail themselves of career counseling services. Among all the services the university can offer to make the non-traditional student’s experience valuable, career counseling is at the top, but it is not the only service students need (Bauman et al., 2004).
According to Noel (1985) commuting students are at particular risk for attrition. A true commuter is one who lives at least 50 miles from school and has not moved from their home to attend school. Commuters, by the nature of their distance relationship with the school, have less commitment to the school as an institution, and re-enrolling year after year can be disruptive and seem like more of a hassle than it is worth.
Ethnic groups represent some of the nontraditional population. Very little research has been completed to determine if the needs of this portion of the group differ from other nontraditional students. However it seems reasonable to believe that there are differences in the needs and problems of these nontraditional students (Marlow, 1989). Black students expressed a need for more black faculty; a support system with blacks; and administrators, faculty, and staff who are sensitive to black issues. Hispanics are more likely to say that child care is a problem (Henry, 1985).
Even among the subset of the non-traditional student, there are those who are more non-traditional than others; students in their 50s, 60s and beyond. Advances in medical treatment and science, in addition to a culture of healthy living, people are living longer, healthier lives. Retirement has changed over the past few decades, and often people are looking to continue their education and beginning new careers. The average age of students on campus is increasing and addressing the specific needs of many different ages will become more critical as time goes on (Marlow, 1989).
Research suggests that one misstep universities and colleges need to avoid is segregating older-than-average and non-traditional students into their own distinctive communities on campus. In order to create a positive experience for all students, schools must institute policies and procedures that acknowledge that learners of different developmental stages and ages both benefit by learning side-by-side in an intergenerational setting. (Gleazer, 1980).
Noel found that financial aid programs need to make themselves known to non-traditional students, as they are often eligible for grants, loans, and part-time work on campus to help manage the costs of going back to school, which can be a large source of stress. Non-traditional students need to know that they are also being taken care of by the college — too often people assume that non-traditional students are aware of all the options available to them. (Noel, 1985).
Services for Women
Women over the age of 30 comprise one of the largest subsets of non-traditional students. Many women re-enter school at a transition point in their life, varying from getting divorced or becoming widows, their children leaving home, or the need to be employed and assist with the family income. Some women have put off seeking higher education until their parents die or their children are in school full-time (Menson, 1982).
Noel’s (1985) statement, “When we get student success, satisfaction and learning together, persistence is the outcome,” is just as true for nontraditional students as it is for traditional students. Successes in college for the nontraditional students relate to programs and services both in the classroom and on campus. Research on college adjustment must reform college administrative practices and college teaching. Understanding and interpreting the lived experience of nontraditional, adult learners gives a richer and deeper understanding of the perceptions and attitudes of an important and growing demographic within higher education.
Aslanian, C.B., & Brickell, H.M. (1980). Americans in transition: Life changes as reasons for adult learning. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
Badenhoop, M.S., & Johansen, M.K. (1980). Do reentry women have special needs? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 591-595.
Baker, R.W., McNeil, O.V., & Siryk, B. (1985). Expectation and reality in freshman adjustment to college. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(1), 94-103.
Barclay, K. (2001). Humanizing learning at a distance. Retrieved March 20, 2011, from http://www.stratvisions.com/dissertation/disertation.html
Bauer, D., & Mott, D. (1990). Life themes and motivations of re-entry students. Journal of Counseling & Development, 68, 555-560.
Bauman, S., Wang, N., Wester Deleon, C., Kafentzis, J., Zavala-Lopez, M., Lindsey, M. (2004). Nontraditional Students’ Service Needs and Social Support Resources: A Pilot Study Journal of College Counseling, (7)
Bean, J.P. (1980). Dropouts and turnover: The synthesis and test of a causal model of student attrition. Research in Higher Education, 12(2), 155-187.
Bowl, M. (2001). Experiencing the barriers: non-traditional students entering higher education. Research Papers in Education, 16(2), 141-160
Buckley, H.D. (1971). A comparison of freshman and transfer expectations. Journal of College Student Personnel, 12, 186-188.
Champagne, D.E., & Petitpas, a. (1989). Planning developmental interventions for adult students. NASPA Journal, 26(4), 265-271.
Dillman, D.A. (1983). Mail and other self-administered questionnaires. In P.H. Rossi, J.D. Wright, & a.B. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of survey research (pp. 359-377). New York: Academic Press.
Donato, D.J. (1973). Junior college transfers and university environment. Journal of College Student Personnel, 14, 254-259.
Fidishun, D. (n.d.). Andragogy and technology: Integrating adult learning theory as we teach with technology. Retrieved March 20, 2011, from http://www.mtsu.edu / ~itconf/proceed00/fidishun.htm
Gibbons, H.S., & Wentworth, G.P. (2001). Andragogical and pedagogical training differences for online instructors. Retrieved March 22, 2011, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall43/gibbons_wentworth43.html
Gleazer, E.J. (1980). The community college: Values, vision and vitality. Washington: American Association of Community and Junior Colleges.
Henry, M.D. (1985). Black reentry females: Their concerns and needs. Journal of the National Association for Women Deans, Administrators and Counselors, 48(4), 5- 10.
Horn, L.J. & Carroll, C.D. (1996) Nontraditional Undergraduates: Trends in enrollment from 1986 to 1992 and Persistence and attainment among 1989-90 Beginning Postsecondary Students. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. 402-857).
House, J.S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Kirk, C.F., & Dorfman, L.T. (1983). Satisfaction and role strain among middle-age and older reentry women students. Educational Gerontology, 9, 15-29.
Laing, C., Kuo-Ming Chao, a. Robinson, P.-C. Sun, Nontraditional student expectations and progression: a game theory approach, vol. 3, pp.F4B7-12, 32nd Annual Frontiers in Education (FIE’02), 2002
Malin, J.T., Bray, J.H., Dougherty, T.W., & Skinner, W.K. (1980). Factors affecting the performance and satisfaction of adult men and women attending college. Research in Higher Education, 13, 115-129.
Marlow, C. (1989). Identifying the problems and needs of nontraditional students at your institution. NASPA Journal, 26(4), 272-277.
Maxfield, R Jeffery, “Online Education for Nontraditional Adult Students: Perceptions and Attitudes of Emergency Services Workers in Asynchronous Learning Environments” (2008). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 114.
Menson, B. (1982). Building on experiences in adult development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Murguia, E., Padilla, R.V., & Pavel, M. (1991, September). Ethnicity and the concept of social integration in Tinto’s model of institutional departure. Journal of College Student Development, 32, 433-439.
Noel, L., Levitz, R., & Saluri, D. (1985). Increasing student retention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Padula, M.A. (1994). Nontraditional women: A literature review with recommendations for counseling and research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 73, 10-16.
Pantages, T.J., & Creedon, C.F. (1978). Studies of college attrition: 1950-1975. Review of Educational Research, 48(1), 49-101.
Pascarella, E., & Chapman, D. (1983). A multi- institutional, path analytic validation of Tinto’s model of college withdrawal. American Educational Research Journal, 20(1), 87-102.
Pascarella, E.T., & Terenzini, P.T. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 60-75.
Sands, R.G., & Richardson, V. (1984). Educational and mental health factors associated with the return of mid-life women to school. Educational Gerontology, 10, 155-170.
Thomas, W. (2001). The decision to return to full-time education. Education Economics, 9(1), 37-51.
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45(1), 89-125.
Tsai, C-C., & Chuang, S-C. (2005). Colloquium: The correlation between epistemological beliefs and preferences toward Internet-based learning environments. British Journal of Education Technology, 36(1), 97-100
Villella, E.F., & Hu, M. (1991). A factor analysis of variables affecting the retention decision of nontraditional college students. NASPA Journal, 28(4), 334-341.
Get Professional Assignment Help Cheaply
Are you busy and do not have time to handle your assignment? Are you scared that your paper will not make the grade? Do you have responsibilities that may hinder you from turning in your assignment on time? Are you tired and can barely handle your assignment? Are your grades inconsistent?
Whichever your reason is, it is valid! You can get professional academic help from our service at affordable rates. We have a team of professional academic writers who can handle all your assignments.
Why Choose Our Academic Writing Service?
- Plagiarism free papers
- Timely delivery
- Any deadline
- Skilled, Experienced Native English Writers
- Subject-relevant academic writer
- Adherence to paper instructions
- Ability to tackle bulk assignments
- Reasonable prices
- 24/7 Customer Support
- Get superb grades consistently
Online Academic Help With Different Subjects
Students barely have time to read. We got you! Have your literature essay or book review written without having the hassle of reading the book. You can get your literature paper custom-written for you by our literature specialists.
Do you struggle with finance? No need to torture yourself if finance is not your cup of tea. You can order your finance paper from our academic writing service and get 100% original work from competent finance experts.
While psychology may be an interesting subject, you may lack sufficient time to handle your assignments. Don’t despair; by using our academic writing service, you can be assured of perfect grades. Moreover, your grades will be consistent.
Engineering is quite a demanding subject. Students face a lot of pressure and barely have enough time to do what they love to do. Our academic writing service got you covered! Our engineering specialists follow the paper instructions and ensure timely delivery of the paper.
In the nursing course, you may have difficulties with literature reviews, annotated bibliographies, critical essays, and other assignments. Our nursing assignment writers will offer you professional nursing paper help at low prices.
Truth be told, sociology papers can be quite exhausting. Our academic writing service relieves you of fatigue, pressure, and stress. You can relax and have peace of mind as our academic writers handle your sociology assignment.
We take pride in having some of the best business writers in the industry. Our business writers have a lot of experience in the field. They are reliable, and you can be assured of a high-grade paper. They are able to handle business papers of any subject, length, deadline, and difficulty!
We boast of having some of the most experienced statistics experts in the industry. Our statistics experts have diverse skills, expertise, and knowledge to handle any kind of assignment. They have access to all kinds of software to get your assignment done.
Writing a law essay may prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, especially when you need to know the peculiarities of the legislative framework. Take advantage of our top-notch law specialists and get superb grades and 100% satisfaction.
What discipline/subjects do you deal in?
We have highlighted some of the most popular subjects we handle above. Those are just a tip of the iceberg. We deal in all academic disciplines since our writers are as diverse. They have been drawn from across all disciplines, and orders are assigned to those writers believed to be the best in the field. In a nutshell, there is no task we cannot handle; all you need to do is place your order with us. As long as your instructions are clear, just trust we shall deliver irrespective of the discipline.
Are your writers competent enough to handle my paper?
Our essay writers are graduates with bachelor's, masters, Ph.D., and doctorate degrees in various subjects. The minimum requirement to be an essay writer with our essay writing service is to have a college degree. All our academic writers have a minimum of two years of academic writing. We have a stringent recruitment process to ensure that we get only the most competent essay writers in the industry. We also ensure that the writers are handsomely compensated for their value. The majority of our writers are native English speakers. As such, the fluency of language and grammar is impeccable.
What if I don’t like the paper?
There is a very low likelihood that you won’t like the paper.
- When assigning your order, we match the paper’s discipline with the writer’s field/specialization. Since all our writers are graduates, we match the paper’s subject with the field the writer studied. For instance, if it’s a nursing paper, only a nursing graduate and writer will handle it. Furthermore, all our writers have academic writing experience and top-notch research skills.
- We have a quality assurance that reviews the paper before it gets to you. As such, we ensure that you get a paper that meets the required standard and will most definitely make the grade.
In the event that you don’t like your paper:
- The writer will revise the paper up to your pleasing. You have unlimited revisions. You simply need to highlight what specifically you don’t like about the paper, and the writer will make the amendments. The paper will be revised until you are satisfied. Revisions are free of charge
- We will have a different writer write the paper from scratch.
- Last resort, if the above does not work, we will refund your money.
Will the professor find out I didn’t write the paper myself?
Not at all. All papers are written from scratch. There is no way your tutor or instructor will realize that you did not write the paper yourself. In fact, we recommend using our assignment help services for consistent results.
What if the paper is plagiarized?
We check all papers for plagiarism before we submit them. We use powerful plagiarism checking software such as SafeAssign, LopesWrite, and Turnitin. We also upload the plagiarism report so that you can review it. We understand that plagiarism is academic suicide. We would not take the risk of submitting plagiarized work and jeopardize your academic journey. Furthermore, we do not sell or use prewritten papers, and each paper is written from scratch.
When will I get my paper?
You determine when you get the paper by setting the deadline when placing the order. All papers are delivered within the deadline. We are well aware that we operate in a time-sensitive industry. As such, we have laid out strategies to ensure that the client receives the paper on time and they never miss the deadline. We understand that papers that are submitted late have some points deducted. We do not want you to miss any points due to late submission. We work on beating deadlines by huge margins in order to ensure that you have ample time to review the paper before you submit it.
Will anyone find out that I used your services?
We have a privacy and confidentiality policy that guides our work. We NEVER share any customer information with third parties. Noone will ever know that you used our assignment help services. It’s only between you and us. We are bound by our policies to protect the customer’s identity and information. All your information, such as your names, phone number, email, order information, and so on, are protected. We have robust security systems that ensure that your data is protected. Hacking our systems is close to impossible, and it has never happened.
How our Assignment Help Service Works
1. Place an order
You fill all the paper instructions in the order form. Make sure you include all the helpful materials so that our academic writers can deliver the perfect paper. It will also help to eliminate unnecessary revisions.
2. Pay for the order
Proceed to pay for the paper so that it can be assigned to one of our expert academic writers. The paper subject is matched with the writer’s area of specialization.
3. Track the progress
You communicate with the writer and know about the progress of the paper. The client can ask the writer for drafts of the paper. The client can upload extra material and include additional instructions from the lecturer. Receive a paper.
4. Download the paper
The paper is sent to your email and uploaded to your personal account. You also get a plagiarism report attached to your paper.
PLACE THIS ORDER OR A SIMILAR ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!